Archive for January, 2013

OAU/AU Golden Jubilee gives special significance to Ethiopia

Addis Ababa, January 26 (WIC) -The National Secretariat for the Organization of the 50th Anniversary Celebration of the OAU/AU said the Golden Jubilee has a special significance for Ethiopia.

Chief Advisor to the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Coordinator of the Secretariat, Professor Mekonnen Hadis told journalists here Friday that Ethiopia is one of the founding countries of the OAU/AU.

Special significance is given to Ethiopia not only because Addis Ababa is the birthplace and seat of the Organization but also due to the country’s unwavering commitment to the ideals of the OAU/AU and also the active role it played in the last 50 years He said various assortments including three documentary films are being prepared as part of the celebration.

One of the films is depicting the establishment and growth of the OAU/AU and also Ethiopia’s role played during the reported period, Prof. Mekonnen said.

According to the Spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Dina Mufti, celebration of the 50th anniversary of OAU/AU will show the future prospects and its current status.

Ambassador Dina said the event will help to demonstrate Africa’s encouraging economic growth as well as its progress in ensuring democratic and human rights. OAU was established on 25 May 1963 in Addis Ababa.

Read Full Post »

Africa: The sleeping Giant up and Running

Sharing a wonderful poem written for OAU/AU 50th Golden Jubilee anniversary.

Professor Mekonen Haddis


Africa:  The Sleeping Giant Up and Running


Let the trumpets sound

Calling on Africans in the Diaspora and on home ground

To get together and commemorate

To rejoice and celebrate

A Golden Jubilee of our Continent

Let the drums reverberate


The year Twenty thirteen

Graciously ushered in

A Fiftieth Anniversary

Heralding Africa’s recovery

Proclaiming the renaissance of the Mother Continent

Its rise from nadir towards Zenith


Let the sounds of the Kora resonate

Calling on Africans to venerate

The Founding Fathers and their arduous quest

For freedom and dignity

For independence and equality

For they fought tooth and nail

Relentlessly without fail

To take us from gloom to brightness

From despair to happiness



Challenges, yes there are still quite a few

But compare those to the existing opportunity

Hidden in Africa’s underbelly

The inexhaustible mineral wealth

The ubiquitous fertile soil

The plentiful reserve of fresh waters

The cultural and historical treasures

The exotic wildlife under the bright sunshine

From Cairo to Cape Town

From Abuja to Addis Ababa

From Kinshasa to Casa Blanca

Whichever way you look

The prospect is never bleak

Go Africa march forward

With determination and optimism abound

Pan Africanism your indispensable shield

Grab the Twenty First Century for yourself and astound the world


                                                                                                                  Long Live African Unity


The National Secretariat for the Organization

of the 50th Anniversary Celebration of the OAU/AU

Read Full Post »

“The Parable of the Frogs” by Morris Berman

Morris Berman’s “The Parable of the Frogs” is a startling article exposing the bankruptcy of Neo-Liberalism.

Professor Mekonen Haddis

“Hell is Truth Seen Too Late”

The Parable of the Frogs

One who knows “enough is enough” always has enough.

Tao Te Ching 

What does it take to produce large-scale social change?  Most historians, if you catch them in an honest moment, will admit that the popular levers of social change, such as education or legislation, are bogus; they don’t really amount to very much.  What does make a difference–and then only potentially–is massive systemic breakdown, such as occurred in the United States in the fall of 2008.  It was the greatest market crash since 1929, leading to widespread unemployment (something like 18% of the population, in real–as opposed to official–statistics*) and the loss of billions of dollars in retirement savings.  In fact, the crash  wiped out $11.1 trillion in household wealth, and this is not counting the several trillion lost in stock market investments.  It had been many decades since the middle class found itself in soup kitchens, and yet there they were.  In the face of all this, however, very little seems to have changed.  Americans are still committed to the dream of unlimited abundance as a “reasonable” goal, when in reality it is (and always has been) the dream of an addict.  President Obama’s upwards of $19 trillion bailout and stimulus plan funneled money into the very banking establishment that gave us the disaster; it rescued the wealthy, not those who really needed the money.  And while he could have appointed economic advisers such as Paul Krugman and Joseph Stiglitz (both Nobel laureates), who would have attempted to put the nation on a different economic path, he chose instead two traditional neoliberal ideologues, Timothy Geithner and Lawrence Summers, who believe in the very policies that led to the crash.  “Change we can believe in” never sounded more hollow.

The metaphor of addiction is extremely relevant to situations such as these, because addicts always seek to maximize their intake (or behavior) rather than optimize it, even though the former leads to self-destruction.  In the face of what seems to be biologically driven activity, reason doesn’t have much of a chance.  An experiment with frogs some years ago demonstrated this quite clearly.  They were wired up with electrodes in the pleasure center of the brain, and could stimulate that center–i.e., create a “rush”–by pressing a metal bar.  Not only did the frogs keep pressing the bar over and over again, but they didn’t stop even when their legs were cut off with a pair of shears!  And if you are going to object that human beings are not frogs, then you probably haven’t been reading the daily newspapers, or observing the behavior of the people around you.

There are, of course, a few intelligent frogs around, ones who struggle to point out the difference between optima and maxima.  One such was the anthropologist Gregory Bateson, perhaps most famous for having been married to Margaret Mead.  For Bateson, the issue was an ethical one.  As he himself put it, “the ethics of optima and the ethics of maxima are totally different ethical systems.”  The ethics of maxima knows only one rule: more.  More is better, in this scheme of things; words such as “limits” or “enough” are either foolish or meaningless.  Clearly, the “American Dream” is a system of maxima, of indefinite expansion.

But what if the reality of all social systems is that they are homeostatic, which is to say, designed to stay in balance?  In that case, said Bateson, the attempt to maximize any single variable (for example, wealth) will eventually push the system into runaway, such that it will destroy itself.  To take a physiological analogy, we recognize that the human body needs only so much calcium per day.  We do not say, “The more calcium I ingest, the better off I’ll be,” because we recognize that past a certain point any chemical element becomes toxic to an organism.  Yet we seem to be unable to extend this insight to the social or economic realm.  We do not say, for example, “That company is making too much profit,” or “That individual (Bill Gates, Carlos Slim) has too much money for one person,” or “The Gross Domestic Product is spinning out of control.”  Rather than being interested in balance, in stability, we are fascinated by asymptotes–frogs at the bar of pleasure, even while our legs are being cut off.  We don’t get it, that if you fight the ecology of a system, you lose, especially when you “win.”

Maximizing a single variable, wrote Bateson, can seem like an ingenious adaptation, but over time it typically turns into pathology.  The saber teeth of a tiger may have had short-range survival value, but this development weakened its flexibility in other situations that proved to be crucial.  The “favored” species became so “favored” that it destroyed its own ecological niche, and disappeared.  A gain at one level became a calamity at another.

A few years ago, two American scholars of the intelligent frog variety began to
understand this line of reasoning and to conclude from it that Adam Smith, with his theory of the “invisible hand,” was wrong.  An early (much milder) version of Gordon Gekko, with his eulogy of greed (in Oliver Stone’s 1987 film, Wall Street), Smith argued that the collective result of individual self-interest was the prosperity of the whole.  But the economist Robert Frank, writing in the New York Times (12 July 2009), argued that “traits that help individuals are harmful to larger groups.  For instance,” he went on,

a mutation for larger antlers served the reproductive interests of an individual male elk, because it helped him prevail in battles with other males for access to mates.  But as this mutation spread, it started an arms race that made life more hazardous for male elk over all.  The antlers of male elk can now span five feet or more.  And despite their utility in battle, they often become a fatal handicap when predators pursue males into dense woods.

In the case of the market, said Frank, individual reward structures undermine the invisible hand.  “To make their funds more attractive to investors,” he wrote, “money managers create complex securities that impose serious, if often well-camouflaged, risks on society.  But when all managers take such steps, they are mutually offsetting.  No one benefits, yet the risk of financial crises rises sharply.”

Similarly, U.S. Appeals Court Judge Richard Posner, in A Failure of Capitalism, pointed out that the crash of 2008 was brought about by individual actions that were actually quite rational: bankers and investors pursuing their own interests.  Reckless behavior was quite consistent, he said, with being well informed about the risks involved in the context of an economic bubble, and so a great many money managers took those risks.  The problem is that what was rational on the individual level was irrational on the collective level, thus leading to a systemic collapse.

We are thus led, quite naturally, from a consideration of optima vs. maxima to the question of individual vs. collective behavior.  Which brings me to one of the twentieth century’s most intelligent frogs, the biologist Garrett Hardin, who posed the dilemma in a famous essay entitled “The Tragedy of the Commons” (1968).  Consider, said Hardin, the example of a pasture shared by local herders.  They all understand that the commons belongs to no one in particular, but supports the well-being of all and is the responsibility of all.  One day, however, one of the herders puts an additional animal out to graze, with the result that he increases his yield.  As a result, the pasture is slightly degraded.  Meanwhile, other herders come to the same conclusion, and as each makes the rational decision to take advantage of the situation for personal gain, the net result is the overgrazing, and ultimately the destruction, of the common area.  In a word, the system favors selfish individuals over those with greater foresight and restraint.  Or as Hardin put it, “Freedom in a commons brings ruin to all.”  Frogs, in a word, are not to be trusted.

How, then, can excess be curbed in a free democratic system?  For we can be sure that the intelligent frogs, who are really quite exceptional, are not going to be listened to, and certainly have no power to enforce their insights.  True, there are certain countries–the Scandanavian nations come to mind–where for some reason the concentration of intelligent frogs is unusually high, resulting in decisions designed to protect the commons.  But on a world scale, this is not very typical.  More typical, and (sad to say) a model for many other countries, is the United States, where proposed “changes” are in fact cosmetic, and where the reality is business as usual.  In the context of 315 million highly addicted frogs, the voices of the smart ones–Bateson, Frank, Posner, Hardin, et al.–aren’t going to have much impact or, truth be told, even get heard.

Of course, authoritarian systems don’t have these problems, which is a good indicator of how things will probably develop.  Under the name of “harmony,” for example, China regulates its citizens for what it perceives to be the common good.  Hence the famous one-child policy, introduced in 1979, supposedly prevented more than 300 million births over the next twenty-nine years in a country that was threatened by its own population density.  In the case of the United States, the imposition of rules and limits on individual behavior to protect the commons is not, at present, a realistic prospect; the population is simply not having it.  But how much longer before this freedom of choice is regarded as an impossible luxury?  In fact, no crystal ball is required to predict the future here.  The tragedy of the commons–what Hardin called “the remorseless working of things”–is that a society such as that of the United States won’t undertake serious changes even when it is sitting on the edge of an abyss.  It has to actually be in the abyss before it will entertain such changes; i.e., it has to be faced with no choice at all.  It seems unlikely now, but things are probably moving faster than we realize.  In terms of population, energy, food, resources, water, social inequality, public health, and environmental degradation, a crunch of the type I am referring to may be only twenty years away.

In Shakespeare’s Two Gentlemen of Verona, the character Valentine is confronted by an outlaw, who asks him if he is content “To make a virtue of necessity/And live, as we do, in this wilderness?”  That may prove to be the only “choice” we have.  As Thomas Hobbes put it a few decades after Shakespeare, “Hell is truth seen too late.”

*These data are easily manipulated by the government to make things look better than they actually are.  For example, individuals collecting unemployment insurance for a few months are officially unemployed, but once that support dries up they are no longer among the statistics of the unemployed even though they are still out of work.  In addition, the millions of Americans who are underemployed, who work only a few hours per week, are included in the ranks of the employed.  Between 2006 and 2009, 20% of American workers were laid off; 50 million live in real poverty, and many more in a category called “near poverty.” Joseph Stiglitz has a good discussion of this in Freefall (New York: W.W. Norton, 2010).

Morris Berman’s latest book is Why America Failed.

Read Full Post »

Ethiopia: African Union 50th Anniversary to Kick-Off

Posted On : January 4th, 2013 |


Indepth Africa

Preparations are well underway in Ethiopia for the celebration of the 50th Anniversary of the African Union.

The Golden Jubilee will be celebrated with a variety of programs ranging from cultural shows panel discussions, documentary films, outdoor and indoor music extravaganza, mass sport, postage to stamp inaugurations, etc., highlighting the eventful journey Ethiopia and the organization made together in the past 50 years. The celebrations will kick-off this month and run until May 25th, the actual date of the establishment of the OAU in Addis Ababa 50 years ago.

A National Committee composed of seven sub-committees drawn from various government offices, has been putting together the activities lined up to mark the occasion colorfully.

The National Committee is now led by a Secretariat based at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The celebration is meant to reflect Ethiopia’s unwavering commitment to the ideals of the OAU/AU and the active role it played in the Organization beginning with the formative stages of the establishment of the OAU, throughout the decolonization process, the post-independence era and the present period.

In the past 50 years, Ethiopia has developed a special relationship with the OAU/AU working with it closely in realizing the vision articulated by the founding fathers 50 years ago. This cooperation has manifested itself in practical action in terms of promoting Africa’s political, economic and social agenda in a wide range of issues, such as conflict resolution, peacekeeping and regional integration as well as the promotion of democracy and good governance.

Read Full Post »

2012 in review

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2012 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

600 people reached the top of Mt. Everest in 2012. This blog got about 9,100 views in 2012. If every person who reached the top of Mt. Everest viewed this blog, it would have taken 15 years to get that many views.

Click here to see the complete report.

Read Full Post »